USAfrica: Africa, U.S. foreign aid and new Congress. By Raynard Jackson

Africa, U.S. foreign aid and the new legislative order in Congress

By Raynard Jackson, Washington DC-based contributing editor and columnist for USAfricaonline.com

Special to USAfricaonline.comCLASSmagazine, The Black Business Journal, USAfrica e-group,  and Nigeria360@yahoogroups e-group

 

USAfrica, April 21, 2011: Whenever the U.S. government enters into a state of fiscal austerity, politicians always look for budget cuts from programs they deem to be less important or have little or no constituency.  Foreign policy budgets, especially those directed towards Africa seem to always show up near the top of that list.The left will blame it on the “mean” Republicans who don’t care about Africa.  The truth is that Africa seems to benefit more from Republican control of Congress/White House than from Democratic control.  Isn’t it amazing that former President George W. Bush did more for Africa than any president in the history of the U.S.?  But, yet, he gets little or no credit for his policies towards Africa.It was the Bush administration that first labeled what was going on in the Sudan as genocide (made by then Secretary of State, Colin Powell before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee).  Bush played a critical role in helping to end the civil war in the Sudan.Under the Bush administration, development aid to Africa quadrupled from $ 1.3 billion in 2001 to more than $ 5 billion in 2008.  The Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC) was created by Bush.

Africa has received in excess of $ 3.5 billion from the fund so far.  The MCC was established to reward poor countries that encouraged economic growth, good governance, and social services for its citizens.The Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) was created in 2000 and expanded under Bush in 2004.  The bill provides trade benefits with the U.S. for 40 African countries that have implemented reforms in their countries to encourage economic growth.The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) was created by Bush and had $ 15 billion appropriated over five years (2003-2008).  I find it amazing that the program has been cut by the Obama administration (though Obama pledged to increase it by $ 1 billion annually during his presidential campaign).Along with PEPFAR, Bush established the U.S. Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria Act of 2003 (or the Global AIDS Act) established the State Department Office of the Global AIDS Coordinator to oversee all international AIDS funding and programmingBush’s policies are credited with saving the lives of millions of Africans.

The political right would argue that America just can’t afford to continue some of these programs.  They don’t question the merits of the programs, just the financial ability of the U.S. to continue to fund them.I put the blame for this type of myopic thinking on two groups.  The first is U.S. supporters of these programs (this includes, politicians, faith based groups, American citizens, etc.).  America must do a better job in explaining why and how these programs impact the U.S.  If we don’t spend the money on the front end (for prevention), we will spend the money on the back end (for treatment, humanitarian intervention, nation building, etc.). I would put most of the responsibility on the second group—African heads of state and their designated U.S. ambassadors!  African leaders and their ambassadors show very little understanding of how to get things done through our political process here in Washington, DC.

Most African ambassadors have no relations with relevant members of Congress on the African committees of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives.How many African diplomats can pick up the phone right now and get Congressman Chris Smith (at home, on his cell, or in his office)?  Smith represents New Jersey’s 4th congressional district and is one of the biggest supporters of Africa that most people have never heard of.  He also happens to be a member of the House’s Committee on Foreign Affairs and chairs the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, and Human Rights. African diplomats constantly complain about what the U.S. is not doing for them or their country’s interests.

They hire high powered lobbyist who have little ability to translate their needs into a language that is understood in the political arena.  They rarely engage the American people as to why their country is important to the U.S and why they should care.   They have no media strategy, no advocate within the halls of the U.S. Congress, and they lack the “friends in high places.”Africans must understand that it is important to engage the American people whether there is a crisis going on in their country or not; whether there is an adverse policy percolating through Congress or not. The new Congress convened in January and there are many new members in both the House and the Senate who are new to their respective African committees.  African diplomats have made little, if any, effort to establish relations with these new members beyond any perfunctory meet and greet. There will most definitely be across the board budget cuts for the foreseeable future.

raynard.jackson.usafricaonline.columnist

How deep they are relative to Africa will depend on how well the African diplomatic community communicates their country’s importance to the American people and relevant members of both the House and the Senate.Based on my private conversations with members of Congress, the White House, members of civil society, and NGOs, Africa doesn’t make the cut in terms of understanding how to make things happen in the U.S.

•Jackson,  Washington DC-based contributing editor and columnist for USAfricaonline.comCLASSmagazine(Houston) and ExcellStyle, is CEO of the public relations/government affairs firm, Raynard Jackson & Associates, LLC. Several of his columns have appeared here at www.USAfricaonline.com

—–

USAfrica: As Egypt’s corrupter-in-chief Mubarak slides into history’s dustbin.  By Chido Nwangwu.http://usafricaonline.com/2011/01/30/chido-nwangwu-as-egypt-corrupter-in-chief-mubarak-slides-into-historys-dustbin-egyptians-not-waiting-for-obama-and-united-nations/

Why Chinua Achebe, the Eagle on the Iroko, is Africa’s writer of the century. By Chido Nwangwu, Publisher of USAfrica, and first African-owned, U.S-based newspaper published on the internet USAfricaonline.com http://usafricaonline.com/chido.achebebest.html

Tunisia, Egypt . . . Is Nigeria next? By Prof. Rosaire Ifedi

——

USAfrica: Ribadu draws first contrast with President Jonathan and PDP ahead of April 2011 presidential elections in Nigeria. By Chido Nwangwu, Publisher of USAfrica.
See the October 17, 2001 special report/alert: Nigeria’s bin-Laden cheerleaders could ignite religious war, destabilize Africa. By USAfrica’s Publisher Chido Nwangwu. http://usafricaonline.com/chido.binladennigeria.html

Why Chinua Achebe, the Eagle on the Iroko, is Africa’s writer of the century. By Chido Nwangwu, Publisher of USAfrica, and first African-owned, U.S-based newspaper published on the internet USAfricaonline.com http://usafricaonline.com/chido.achebebest.html

USAfrica, and first African-owned, U.S-based newspaper published on the internet USAfricaonline.com; The Black Business Journal, CLASSmagazine,  PhotoWorks.TV,  AchebeBooks.comNigeria360USAfricaTV and several blogs, assessed by The New York TImes as the largest and arguably most influential multimedia networks for Africans and Americans. News@USAfricaonline.com. wireless: 1-832-45-CHIDO (24436). Office: 713-270-5500.

Related Post

2 COMMENTS

  1. Once upon a time,were considered only watches.Replica Watches not yet introduced and people had to bear the simple watches they were happy.There was simply no need for Replica Rolex since most of the watches were simple and affordable.In those days most of the watches were simple timepieces and most were affordable. Yes, there were hints that made his body in gold, but it was not enough to go to the people and order. Now was not that expensive, nor that watches them. Replica Breitling. The new generation professionals have enough money to be able to enjoy the finer things in life.
    However, not all of them have the financial capacity to go for brands such as replica tag heuer, replica cartier, replica omega, etc. These professionals are now hoping to have found with these cheap replica watches. Then there are two major advantages in the luxury watches replica. Firstly, you do not have to pay an astronomical price for it, and secondly, these replica audemars piguet for most leaders and the more expensive brands are available. People like to see and show love, especially with the girls. The best way to show your class is by wearing replica panerai. Can you imagine what impression you make on your friends and colleagues when you wearing Cartier replica panerai in the morning and Piaget replica watch in the evening?

iCOMMENT