Special to USAfrica magazine (Houston) and USAfricaonline.com, the first Africa-owned, US-based newspaper published on the Internet.
Afe Babalola’s perceived high-handedness against Dele Farotimi, the combination of procedural missteps, public critiques, and the resurgence of past allegations has created a perfect storm, threatening to overshadow his illustrious career. For Dele Farotimi, it highlights the power of principled resistance in the face of adversity. Afe Babalola seems locked into a reputational free fall. This saga offers profound lessons for leaders, lawyers, and public servants.
Nkpa ıs a contributıng analyst to the platforms of USAfrıcaLive
December 11, 2024: In the complicated arena of Nigerian leadership and jurisprudence, few incidents are as revealing of character and principle as the ongoing saga involving Afe Babalola (SAN), attorney Dele Farotimi. This saga has transcended the confines of a legal dispute, evolving into a critical examination of leadership, ethics, and the public perception of accoun
tability. Also, Peter Obi’s recent visit to Afe Babalola has added to the issues but Obi’s moves reflect his trademark statesmanship – a leader committed to dialogue and bridge-building.
His move was not instigated by Dele Farotimi but stems from a broader philosophy of seeking unity, even amid controversy. Yet, this gesture has not erased the harsh realities facing Afe Babalola in the wake of this crisis.
Afe Babalola is a towering figure in Nigeria’s legal landscape, and he is celebrated for his contributions to jurisprudence and education. Yet, his actions in this controversy suggest a dramatic miscalculation.
1. Weaponizing an alleged Criminal Defamation: Opting for criminal defamation charges instead of a civil suit, coupled with the dramatic denial of bail and public handcuffing of Dele Farotimi, has drawn widespread condemnation. This approach is seen as an overreach, tarnishing Babalola’s image as a paragon of justice.
2. Afe Babalola’s Citing of a Nonexistent Law: The senior lawyer’s written petition referencing a law that does not exist, as widely reported, is a glaring error. This has exposed him to ridicule, raising questions about his legal precision or integrity. For a figure of his stature, such an error or deliberate maneuver is more than a footnote; it is a glaring chink in the armor of his legacy.
3. Jurisdictional Maneuvers: The decision to move the case from an Ekiti Court to the Federal High Court, accompanied by inconsistent charges, reeks of highly embarrassing procedural gymnastics. While the police bear some responsibility, the petitioner – Afe Babalola – cannot be absolved of involvement. The optics of this maneuver undermine his credibility and fuel public criticism.
4. Dele Farotimi’s Charitable Gesture: Dele’s decision to donate all proceeds from the book at the center of this controversy to charity paints him as a man of principle, further contrasting with Afe Babalola’s actions.
5. Femi Falana’s Critique: Nigeria’s renowned human rights lawyer Femi Falana openly criticized Afe Babalola for his role in defending flawed electoral outcomes. This critique underscores a broader issue: the ethical implications of Afe Babalola’s legal career and lawyering strategies in shaping Nigeria’s political landscape contributed for spinning the country downhill.
6. WikiLeaks Revelation: The resurgence of a WikiLeaks file which left Afe Babalola with the profile of a “dirty” and corrupting lawyer. While such claims may not carry legal weight, their reemergence in this context reinforces negative public perception.
Peter Obi’s role in this saga is a good example of modern leadership. Despite previously condemning Afe Babalola’s actions as irresponsible – a statement he has neither retracted nor apologized for – Obi visited Babalola to build bridges. His visit, devoid of any hint of capitulation, underscores his commitment to fostering peace and dialogue. Interestingly, Afe Babalola, during Obi’s visit, did not demand a retraction or explanation for the earlier statement. This silence suggests a deeper realization – including that public opinion has shifted against him. Public perception is often the final arbiter in such controversies, and here, Dele Farotimi appears to be the unequivocal victor.
His principled stand, charitable actions, and growing public admiration have contrasted sharply with Afe Babalola’s perceived high-handedness. Afe Babalola, on the other hand, seems trapped in a reputational free fall. The combination of procedural missteps, public critiques, and the resurgence of past allegations has created a perfect storm, threatening to overshadow his illustrious career. This saga offers profound lessons for leaders, lawyers, and public servants.
For Afe Babalola, it is a stark reminder that a legacy is not only built on past achievements but also on the actions one takes in moments of crisis. For Obi, it reaffirms the importance of leadership rooted in dialogue and bridge-building. For Dele Farotimi, it highlights the power of principled resistance in the face of adversity. The Afe Babalola-Dele Farotimi saga will undoubtedly be remembered as a defining moment in Nigeria’s socio-political discourse. While Afe Babalola may yet emerge victorious in court, the court of public opinion has already rendered its verdict.
This controversy underscores the critical importance of integrity, both in leadership and in the practice of law.
As Nigerians continue to watch this drama unfold, one thing is clear: the lessons from this saga will resonate far beyond the courtroom, shaping the nation’s understanding of justice, accountability, and legacy.
USAfrica: Why I Voted for Kamala, America and Africa. By Chido Nwangwu
