Ken Imansuagbon, a prominent member of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Edo State and a former gubernatorial candidate, has expressed grave concerns over a Federal High Court ruling that declared the party’s leadership invalid. Imansuagbon characterized the ruling as a politically motivated attack on the ADC that could lead to unrest and threaten Nigeria’s democratic stability.
Speaking out against the decision on Friday, he cautioned that the judgment might incite chaos across the nation, describing it as a desperate action that could ignite widespread disorder. He remarked, “Don’t set Nigeria on fire. This judgment is an invitation to chaos and anarchy,” emphasizing the ruling’s potential to undermine national unity and safety.
Imansuagbon asserted that any efforts to exclude the ADC from the 2027 elections would ultimately fail. He criticized the government for using its power to intimidate citizens and called upon the international community to help protect Nigeria’s democracy. Furthermore, he stated that the current judiciary is under excessive political influence, indicating a decline in judicial independence.
The ADC leader also voiced support for former Vice-President Atiku Abubakar, labeling him as the sole candidate capable of reversing Nigeria’s current situation under President Bola Tinubu. He urged the Court of Appeal to act favorably to ensure the party’s continued participation in electoral matters.
Reflecting on the broader implications of the ruling, Imansuagbon expressed concern that such judgments could provoke civil unrest and jeopardize the unity of the country. He drew parallels between the current political climate and authoritarian regimes in Africa, questioning the legacy that President Tinubu aims to build.
In a recent ruling, Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court nullified the ADC leadership led by David Mark, along with the party’s presidential candidate selection process. Imansuagbon remains optimistic that the verdict will be overturned on appeal, highlighting the importance of collective action in defending democracy.
